Maple 6 LabsUse the download capability of your browser to download the links. The links are *.mws (version 6) files and not html files.IntroductiuonThis set of Maple labs has been developed over a number of years. I have
put these labs into the Maple 6 format. I am not sure what this means in terms of compatibility with earlier versions of Maple. Most of the labs were originally written for earlier versions. This merely points to a problem that seems to be endemic with commercial software. That is, the constant revision of commercial software without any real advance in the technology. It is my hope that a consortium of educators in technical areas will some day set standards for updating software that will provide some stability to the communities they serve. Until that day, I must apologize to those who do not yet have access to Maple 6.
There are, of course, many possible approaches to doing computer laboratories in calculus. I have been using Maple and Mathematica in the classroom for more than 10 years. My basic approach is seasoned by this. In these labs I have emphasized an empirical method of understanding calculus. It is my belief that the empirical approach was important in the development of calculus. By empirical I mean an approach to calculus which provides intuition concerning the theory which is gotten from experience in calculations rather than by a memorized set of manipulations. As an example, it is worthwhile to prove the power rule for a few low dimensional cases in class. One can go through the same essential proofs simplifying the differential quotient for a large number of cases in a very short time using Maple. The pattern should become obvious. More importantly, working at a computer is less passive than hearing a lecture. But note that the emphasis here is on the student forming a conjecture based on experience with a large number of cases. Surely this is how a great deal of mathematics is done. At the same time it should be easier to follow a general proof of the power rule in the lecture if the student already has some intuition. A second example of this approach is to demonstrate each new integral method by means of an actual Riemann sum. Repeated use of the converging Riemann sum ,to prove that integration works, should give the student a better understanding of the theory of integration and the practical aspect of solving non-trivial integrals numerically. It is true that the calculus of Newton and Leibniz does not exhibit this notion of empirical calculus, but we must remember that Newton wrote his calculus from a geometric point of view emulating Euclid and the Greek geometers. Moreover, Newton wrote his calculus long after he had made his important contributions. The development of calculus by Barrow and Newton was symbolic rather than geometric. Liebniz on the other hand was interested primarily in the universal, symbolic, and manipulative character of calculus. Leibniz's methods dominated Continental mathematics until contradictions occurred which cast into doubt this naive approach. These contradictions led to the modern theory of limits, differentiability and Riemann sums. Calculus I
|