In this paper, I raise two objections against Van Inwagen's view that identity is indeterminate. Van Inwagen's case for this view relies mainly on the development of a semantics that makes invalid Evans' classical argument on the indeterminacy of identity. My objections to Van Inwagen are the following: I first argue that the semantics is structurally inadequate to fulfill the function that Van Inwagen sets for it and then I show that his semantics does not take into account certain semantic relationships.