Though the Sellarsian dilemma in its various formulations has been a persistent and, at times, rather effective argument against foundationalist theories of epistemic justification, I argue that a solution to all forms of the dilemma is to require for justification direct awareness of the fit that holds between one’s foundational doxastic attitude and the relevant nondoxastic state. I formulate the dilemma in general terms and then consider Michael Bergmann’s recent formulation. I argue it is not enough that S has a belief that fits her evidence but that S must be directly aware of this fit. Direct awareness is what has classically been called acquaintance, where there are no judgments mediating the relation of awareness. I argue that when one is directly aware of fit, one is necessarily in a positive epistemic situation and this blocks the subject’s perspective objection without giving way to regress.