Criterio de evaluación para los informes escritos

FLS Español 2201

Dr. Carlos C. Amaya 

CONTENIDO Y ORGANIZACIÓN

40-34 topic well-thought-out and carefully developed with effective supporting detail; interesting to read; clear thesis; flow of ideas fluid and logical

33-29 topic may not be fully explored; development is adequate although some ideas may be incompletely supported or irrelevant; interesting ideas in places; main ideas stand out but reader may sometimes have difficulty following flow of ideas.

28-20 topic explored only superficially and inadequately developed with many ideas unsupported or irrelevant; ideas frequently confused and/or disconnected, with logical breakdowns apparent; reader frequently has difficulty “getting the point” of message as communicated

19-15 shows no awareness of reader needs; ideas superficial and/or uninteresting with little development; logical organization absent

0-14 few ideas or little information; no organization; OR not enough to evaluate


GRAMÁTICA

30-24 wide range of structures with few or no significant errors (e.g. sentence structure)

23-18 adequate range of structures, but little variety; tends to overuse simple constructions; both significant and minor errors (e.g. agreement) present, but meaning seldom obscured

17-10 limited range of structures with control of grammar uncertain; errors frequent, especially when more complex constructions attempted; meaning often confused or obscured

9-7 frequent and persistent errors of basic grammar and sentence construction; meaning blocked as text dominated by errors

7-0 meaning almost totally blocked OR not enough to evaluate

VOCABULARIO

20-18 language choices appropriate for topic, purpose and reader; excellent use of idioms and precise, colorful vocabulary; little or no evidence of English interference

17-14language choices usually appropriate for topic, purpose and reader; vocabulary accurate but may be somewhat limited; some errors or interference may be present but meaning rarely obscured

13-10 language choices sometimes inappropriate for topic, purpose and reader; vocabulary very limited, with overuse of imprecise or vague terms; English interference evident, particularly with respect to idioms; meaning often confused or obscured

9-7 language choices often inappropriate for topic, purpose and reader; range of vocabulary extremely limited; English interference frequent

7-0 language choices obscure meaning beyond recognition; OR not enough to evaluate

adapted from Valdés, Guadalupe et al.Composición: Proceso y síntesis. 3ª edición.Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1999.